@article {Li:2016:2637-8329:123,
title = "Potential Pitfalls When Differentiating Hemorrhage and Calcium on Susceptibility-Weighted Images",
journal = "Neurographics",
parent_itemid = "infobike://asnr/ng",
publishercode ="asnr",
year = "2016",
volume = "6",
number = "3",
publication date ="2016-05-01T00:00:00",
pages = "123-126",
itemtype = "ARTICLE",
issn = "2637-8329",
eissn = "2637-8329",
url = "https://asnr.publisher.ingentaconnect.com/content/asnr/ng/2016/00000006/00000003/art00001",
doi = "doi:10.3174/ng.3160151",
keyword = "MR = magnetic resonance, SWI = susceptibility weighted imaging, SNR = signal-to-noise ratio",
author = "Li, C.Q. and Imbesi, S.G. and Lee, R.R. and Haacke, E.M. and Chen, J.Y.",
abstract = "The imaging phase data captured by MR susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) can provide biochemical information not currently evaluable by other MR imaging techniques, such as distinguishing between calcium and hemorrhage. We presented a case that illustrates the use of internal controls
within filtered phase images, such as intracranial veins and pineal and/or choroid calcifications, to improve the reliability of using phase images to differentiate calcium and blood products. We also described how to avoid pitfalls in interpreting susceptibility-driven phase aliasing and
dipole field effects.",
}